Esper wrote:At least the EGM reviewer actually PLAYED the game. I may not agree with him, but at least it's unbiased and actually goes into several relevant points.
http://www.egmnow.com/articles/reviews/ ... tunia-mk2/
Can't delete emoticon, stupid phone... Anyways, yes, here's an actual review of someone who played it, who isn't judging it based on looks alone...
Ghaleon wrote:vampko wrote:It's not much better to make a topic solely dedicated to complaining about how much reviewers dislike the game you like >.>
What i said about fanbase. But even still, their opinion is supposedly Professional, and they get paid for it. Why should a fan forum, with underage kids included within, be expected to a higher standard. Vampy-pooh, youre normally nice, why such a snarky meanie pants.
Aww that phrase makes me want to play MK2 all the more! Anyways yes, I speak of professionalism, in which the above reviews had none, and yet sadly, get paid for it. It's the equivalent of doing a review of a Queens Blade game, where the review simply says "boobs". Now, that says nothing about the game, and I'm sure they'd add on how perverted it is, yadda yadda....
Speaking of reviewers, movie critics sure don't have the most professionalism either, making jokes left and right. Yeah, I check Rotten Tomatoes every now and then, but I never actually read the reviews.















