Slice of Life Mafia Antagonists Win!

[Redhorse]

If enough people want it, I can append the rule so it will only state if they were scum or not?

Agreed.

Seconded.

Third-ed?

[Xeras]

If enough people want it, I can append the rule so it will only state if they were scum or not?

Agreed.

+1 ^^

[ShadowJetX]

Sign me up brah.

Not reading the first 2-3 pages brah.

[Empty Overture]

Hey, hey! I'm joining!
/stopped.
...wait, I'm not? Oh! Right! Ahaha! I know why~ It even states it in the rrrrrrurues~ Well then, I hope you all have a wonderful game~ I'm going to be the best co-host I can be!

[vampko]

Sign me up brah.

Not reading the first 2-3 pages brah.

I recommend reading the rules, unless you're fine with being surprised by my changes?

[ShadowJetX]

Sign me up brah.

Not reading the first 2-3 pages brah.

I recommend reading the rules, unless you're fine with being surprised by my changes?

I've read the rules at the very least brah.

Add me to the players list brah.

[vampko]

Sign me up brah.

Not reading the first 2-3 pages brah.

I recommend reading the rules, unless you're fine with being surprised by my changes?

I've read the rules at the very least brah.

Add me to the players list brah.

Alright then, just had to make sure of that.

[lopez]

1) Aphrah
2) PringlesXD
3) Xeras
4) Mizu
5) Adtl
6) Redhorse
7) SjSharks
8) Ubiquitor
9) JerichoDeath
10) SJX
11) Pez

Personally, I prefer the no reveal death scenes. It adds to the tension and mystery of the game, making the overall experience more meaningful.

[JerichoDeath]

Personally, I prefer the no reveal death scenes. It adds to the tension and mystery of the game, making the overall experience more meaningful.

You can have the tension and mystery with "no role reveal, yes alignment reveal" without adding the inherent confusion that will come with a missing alignment reveal.

[lopez]

Personally, I prefer the no reveal death scenes. It adds to the tension and mystery of the game, making the overall experience more meaningful.

You can have the tension and mystery with "no role reveal, yes alignment reveal" without adding the inherent confusion that will come with a missing alignment reveal.

It also adds to the investigation aspect Vamp mentioned. Subsequent quick hammer lynches, focused tunneling of individuals, etc... should all be red flags for suspicious behavior. Basically, revealing alignment seems like a crutch for the town.

[JerichoDeath]

It also adds to the investigation aspect Vamp mentioned. Subsequent quick hammer lynches, focused tunneling of individuals, etc... should all be red flags for suspicious behavior. Basically, revealing alignment seems like a crutch for the town.

It's the opposite, the opposite. The reveal is all about getting satisfaction, and giving the investigators clear results on their work. You lynch someone without the ability to see who they work for after, and it becomes monotonous.
"Well, person lynched.... sigh... onto the next one."

On the other hand, if you know the alignment after lynch:
"Let's see... let's see... Ohhhh! I wonder how this will effect the game~"

EDIT:
You could say that missing alignment turns everyone into wine dispensers >.>

[SjSharks182]

You could say that missing alignment turns everyone into wine dispensers >.>

this x1000

And I don't get how it makes the game more investigative, intuitive maybe, but not more investigative. The more info you have, the better and more ways you can investigate; the less you have, the less you can do.

[Ubiquitor]

Indeed, a good investigation requires solid evidence as a basis. Without flips or flavour everything becomes mere speculation.

[MizuMikomi]

You all are debating something that Vamp already said he would append if enough people wanted, it's kind of pointless that you've continued on with it.

Oh and regarding the alignment reveal, I agree with at least that, so +1.

[JerichoDeath]

A debate to convince people to vote for appending the rule = not pointless, since the rule has not yet been appended >.>