NIS America Forums

by **PringlesXD** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:16 am

I'm going to read the thread; then I'll make my judgement.

by **Ubiquitor** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:26 am

vampko wrote:I always uphold the game's rules even if it means hurting myself or others in the process.

I believe that your definition of "Mass reveal" is different from the standard.

Edit: SJX, define "Mass reveal" to clarify your rules.

vampko wrote:I wish I could sway your votes, but I don't see it happening all that simply. I am in a tough position.

It doesn't seem like you want to provide any information. Why not explain your reason for knowing of Prinapocalypse's innocence?

Day 2:

L-3

by **vampko** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:42 am

Because, as I stated. I'm the one who was guilty.

That would make Prin innocent.

Just please, no matter what happens don't vote prin out unless you get some other sort of information. I am pretty positive he's one of the villains, and not a hero. Though, if he has some ability that screws with investigations then that would be troublesome as well -_-

by **lopez** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:48 am

Hmmm...so if Vamp got the "guilty" verdict, wouldn't that imply he's a villian? His claim of "catwoman" is indeed a villain, so that makes sense. If villian = town then that would make being "innocent" = mafia. If both Clay and Vamp's comments & claims are to be true and held together, then:

Unvote
Vote: Prin

I will remove my vote if he claims and it fits into this puzzling conundrum.

Website · by **TheForeignGamer** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:49 am

Just letting you all know, I'm off for tonight. I'll likely check the thread in the morning when I wake up before school starts.

by **ShadowJetX** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:50 am

Ubiquitor wrote:Edit: SJX, define "Mass reveal" to clarify your rules.

Its legit so far. I don't see it as a Mass Reveal (yet).

I was thinking L-7, but L-8 sounds more fair.

The conversation just happens to pick up after I leave for a bit. I went out to play Grounders if anyone was wondering.

by **vampko** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 10:53 am

Fine

I'm a death miller.

I turn up guilty no matter what, even when I die, I still flip guilty.

I feel like this is really stretching things, but whatever

by **Ubiquitor** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:00 am

vampko wrote:I'm a death miller.

I thank you, vampko.

Unvote

by **Xeras** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:02 am

Okay.
So the only way to prove if vampko is a death miller is to lynch prin.
Unvote,
Vote prin.

by **Empty Overture** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:02 am

Which means both Prin, and Vampko are innocent.

We're wasting our time voting for them.

by **PringlesXD** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:04 am

Wait a second-- did Vampko show up as innocent or guilty?

by **vampko** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:08 am

Claymore's role won't let him know who it was.

But, considering my role, it's pretty obvious I showed up guilty. Since that's all I can show up as

by **Ubiquitor** » Thu Apr 26, 2012 11:08 am

Empty Overture wrote:Which means both Prin, and Vampko are innocent.

We're wasting our time voting for them.

That is the unfortunate truth. If we assume claymore speaks the truth, lynching either of them is a bad idea. If our goal is to "verify" claymore's claim, lynching vampko (assuming his flip implies miller in the least) would likely provide more information than lynching Prinapocalypse, since a scum claymore could not predict a miller, but could predict a standard townie. It is not the best situation given the remaining time.